Supplier-supplied records are under 7 % of the index and they cluster on compounds where independent submissions are rare. That correlation is worth knowing before pooling them.
thin_coverage
Tracks which supplier–compound cells in the index are empty and why.
Section 1
Contribution
Comments technically on records submitted by others. Annotations are signed and are not moderated for agreement.
Records submitted
0
n=0
Annotations
34
n=34
Median purity submitted
suppressed
n=0
n<3 — see individual records
Suppliers covered
0
n=0
This handle has submitted no records. Annotators comment on other people's submissions and are not required to submit.
Section 2
Annotations
Signed technical comments on records. The index does not moderate annotations for agreement with its own arithmetic, and several of these disagree with it. Where a handle has made the same point on several records, one instance is shown and the rest are reachable from the records themselves.
Coverage on this compound is thin enough that one record moves the class median visibly. That is a statement about the index rather than about the material, and it is why the n= badge sits beside every aggregate.
The supplier-compound cells with no endotoxin data at all are mapped on the coverage page. They are most of the matrix.
The index would rather this page said nothing about endotoxin than said something unsupported. That is the standing editorial position and it is applied uniformly.
The index records the absence rather than imputing a value. An unmeasured property is unmeasured, and the specification block above says so explicitly.
The status field caps at what the panel supports. Endotoxin is one of the orthogonal measurements that would lift it, and it was not ordered.
The status field reads PURITY ONLY, which is precisely what the record is. Nothing is being withheld and nothing is being implied.
The rule has fired on well under one per cent of the index. That rate is the context for reading any individual instance, and it is on the rule page.
Nothing adverse on this record. The gap is a coverage gap in the index and in the market, and it is stated rather than glossed.
Worth flagging to whoever submits next on this lot.
Showing 10 distinct comments of 34 annotations by this handle.