AssayIndex
Cross-section

Afamelanotide by laboratory

The same compound measured by different laboratories on different gradients. Where the medians differ, the question is whether the material differed or the method did — and for Afamelanotide, with a class minimum gradient of 22 min, the method is a live explanation.

43 recordsmedian 99.06 %spec 98.0 %
LaboratoryReportsGradientMS resolutionMedian purity %Published bias (pp)Bias-adjustedMethod suitability
Janoshik2130minHigh99.14+0.0099.14ADEQUATE
Medutest6 n=625minUnit98.81+0.0898.73ADEQUATE
PeptideMeter5 n=528minHigh98.42-0.0598.47ADEQUATE
Nordanalyt5 n=535minHigh99.31+0.0299.29ADEQUATE
VendorInvestigate4 n=432minHigh99.19-0.1199.30ADEQUATE
Kestrel2 n=215minUnit99.93, 98.87+0.24BELOW CLASS MINIMUM
97.497.898.398.899.299.7100.1JanoshikJanoshik: Q1 98.22, median 99.14, Q3 99.38, n=21n=21PeptideMeterPeptideMeter: Q1 98.37, median 98.42, Q3 98.85, n=5outlier 97.57n=5MedutestMedutest: Q1 98.49, median 98.81, Q3 99.28, n=6n=6VendorInvestigateVendorInvestigate: Q1 98.80, median 99.19, Q3 99.36, n=4n=4NordanalytNordanalyt: Q1 99.27, median 99.31, Q3 99.38, n=5outlier 98.13outlier 99.64n=5KestrelKestrel: Q1 99.14, median 99.40, Q3 99.67, n=2n=2 Purity (% area)
Figure. Afamelanotide purity by contributing laboratory. Any offset between rows has two possible sources — a real difference in the material each laboratory happened to receive, and the laboratory's own bias — and this figure cannot separate them. The paired analysis that can is on inter-lab agreement.