AssayIndex
Cross-section

IGF-1 LR3 by laboratory

The same compound measured by different laboratories on different gradients. Where the medians differ, the question is whether the material differed or the method did — and for IGF-1 LR3, with a class minimum gradient of 15 min, the method is a live explanation.

118 recordsmedian 98.28 %spec 95.0 %
LaboratoryReportsGradientMS resolutionMedian purity %Published bias (pp)Bias-adjustedMethod suitability
Janoshik5130minHigh98.15+0.0098.15ADEQUATE
Medutest2825minUnit98.50+0.0898.42ADEQUATE
PeptideMeter1728minHigh98.48-0.0598.53ADEQUATE
VendorInvestigate932minHigh97.64-0.1197.75ADEQUATE
Kestrel915minUnit98.38+0.2498.14ADEQUATE
Nordanalyt4 n=435minHigh97.84+0.0297.82ADEQUATE
96.597.197.798.398.999.5100.1JanoshikJanoshik: Q1 97.71, median 98.15, Q3 98.89, n=51n=51PeptideMeterPeptideMeter: Q1 97.93, median 98.48, Q3 98.76, n=17n=17MedutestMedutest: Q1 98.16, median 98.50, Q3 98.78, n=28outlier 99.74outlier 99.84n=28VendorInvestigateVendorInvestigate: Q1 97.61, median 97.64, Q3 98.47, n=9n=9NordanalytNordanalyt: Q1 97.55, median 97.84, Q3 97.95, n=4n=4KestrelKestrel: Q1 98.26, median 98.38, Q3 98.65, n=9outlier 96.98outlier 97.45outlier 99.36n=9 Purity (% area)
Figure. IGF-1 LR3 purity by contributing laboratory. Any offset between rows has two possible sources — a real difference in the material each laboratory happened to receive, and the laboratory's own bias — and this figure cannot separate them. The paired analysis that can is on inter-lab agreement.