AX-2025-020211 · BPC-157 · GGPeps lot GGPE-2509-N9693

Section 1

Results

Measured against the index acceptance specification for the tissue-repair and immunomodulatory peptides class. A specification is a decision the index made; a result is a measurement. See where each threshold came from.

Parameter	Method	Result	Unit	Index spec
Purity	RP-HPLC, 30 min gradient, 214 nm	98.80	% area	≥ 98.0	PASS
Total impurities	RP-HPLC, sum of reported peaks	1.20	% area	≤ 2.0	PASS
Largest single impurity	RP-HPLC — acetylated N-terminus (+42 Da)	0.54	% area	≤ 1.00	PASS
Identity — theoretical monoisotopic mass	calculated from molecular formula	1418.7093	Da	—	NOT TESTED
Identity — observed monoisotopic mass	LC-MS, high resolution (ESI-TOF/QTOF)	1418.6487	Da	—	NOT TESTED
Mass accuracy	observed vs theoretical	-42.7	ppm	± 15	FAIL
Peptide content	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	required to check label claim	NOT TESTED
Water content	Karl Fischer, coulometric, duplicate	3.57	%	≤ 10.0	PASS
Counter-ion (acetate)	anion-exchange ion chromatography	4.90	%	≤ 12.0	PASS
Residual solvent + inorganic residue	estimated — see /methods/residual-solvents-q3c/	0.92	%	—	NOT TESTED
Endotoxin	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	≤ 5.0	NOT TESTED
Sterility	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	no growth	NOT TESTED
Appearance	visual, diffuse light, black and white background	White cake, partially collapsed	—	white to off-white intact cake	FAIL
Reconstitution clarity	reconstituted per submitter procedure	Clear, colourless, no visible particulates	—	clear, no visible particulates	PASS
pH (reconstituted, 1 mg/mL)	potentiometric, two-point calibration	5.25	—	2.5 – 8.0	PASS
Retention time (observed)	RP-HPLC, 30 min gradient	9.47	min	9.62 ± 0.25 (normalised)	PASS
Peak asymmetry (10 % height)	Ph. Eur. 2.2.46	1.12	—	0.80 – 1.50	PASS
Plate count, main peak	N = 5.54 (t/w½)²	70,900	—	≥ 20,000	PASS
Resolution to nearest impurity	vs [D-Val]-diastereomer	0.96	—	no index criterion	REPORTED

Section 2

Chromatogram and peak integration

The figure is drawn from the table. It is not an independent illustration — if a number in the table changed, the trace would change with it.

Figure 1. RP-HPLC trace, 30 min gradient, 214 nm. Drawn from the peak-integration table below: peak positions are the reported retention times, peak areas are the reported area percentages, peak widths follow the reported plate count of 70,900, and skew follows the reported asymmetry factor of 1.12. Baseline noise is seeded from the report ID and is illustrative. The lower panel is the same trace at a stated vertical expansion with the slow gradient drift subtracted, because at full scale a 0.54 % impurity against a 98.80 % main peak is a line two pixels tall; the main peak runs off-scale there by design.

#	Peak	RT	Area (µV·s)	% area	Δ mass (Da)
1	BPC-157 — main peak	9.47	4,801,986	98.80	—
2	acetylated N-terminus (+42 Da)	9.95	26,246	0.54	+42.011
3	[D-Val]-diastereomer	9.33	20,899	0.43	0.000
4	des-Gly truncate (−57 Da)	9.13	7,776	0.16	-57.021
5	truncated (1-12)	8.51	2,430	0.05	-285.132
6	BPC-157 arginine-salt artefact	8.92	486	0.01	0.000
7	pyroglutamate cyclisation (−17 Da)	9.78	486	0.01	-17.027
Closure check — purity + Σ impurities				100.00	CLOSES

Reporting threshold 0.05 % area. Peaks below it are not reported and are therefore excluded from the total, which overstates purity by their sum — see peak integration.

Section 3

Mass spectrum and identity

Theoretical monoisotopic mass 1418.7093 Da, computed from C62H98N16O22. All ppm figures on this site are against monoisotopic values — see why that matters.

Figure 2. ESI charge-state envelope, high-resolution instrument. Sticks are placed at m/z = (M + z × 1.007276)/z for the observed neutral mass of 1418.6487 Da. Sodium (+21.982/z) and potassium (+37.956/z) adducts are shown where the parent charge state exceeds 25 % relative abundance; they are adducts of the same molecule and are not impurities.

Charge	Theoretical m/z	Observed m/z	Δ m/z	Rel. abundance (%)
3+	473.9104	473.8902	-0.0202	8.6
2+	710.3619	710.3316	-0.0303	51.8
1+	1419.7166	1419.6560	-0.0606	100.0

Section 4

Gravimetric mass balance

Water, counter-ion, residual and total peptide content are exhaustive and mutually exclusive categories. They must account for 100 % of the cake mass. The index closes this to within 0.02 pp and the build asserts it.

Supplier certificate, as declared

The supplier's own figures for this lot, beside the independent measurement. Divergence is assessed against the batch median, not against this single report — see rule AX-R05.

Figure	Supplier COA	This report	Index note
Purity (% area)	99.21	98.80	divergence +0.45 pp vs batch median
Total impurities (% area)	0.79	1.20
Largest single impurity (% area)	0.55	0.54
Water (%)	2.6	3.57
Counter-ion (%)	7.8	4.90
Peptide content (%w/w)	89.0	not determined
Endotoxin (EU/mg)	0.45	not determined
Method stated on certificate	NO	—	no method section — the result cannot be reconciled against any other

Section 5

Provenance and caveats

Where a sample came from changes the weight of the evidence. The index treats it as a first-class field.

Sample provenance: Buyer-sourced
Evidentiary weight: Strongest available evidence in this index.
Chain of custody: Retail purchase → third-party forwarder (24 d) → laboratory (courier, cold pack, 12 d) → assay.
Assay date: 18 Nov 2025
Submitted to the index: 06 Dec 2025
Laboratory: Janoshik Analytical, Ostrava, Czechia
Method basis: 30 min gradient · high-resolution MS
Verification status: IDENTITY CONSISTENT

What this report does not establish

How much of the named compound is in the vial. Peptide content was not determined, so recovered mass cannot be calculated and the label claim cannot be checked.
That the material is free of bacterial endotoxin. Endotoxin was not measured. No chromatographic result bears on it.
That the material is sterile. Sterility was not tested.
That any other vial in the same lot has the same composition. One vial was tested. Within-lot vial-to-vial variation in this index has a median of 0.28 pp and a 90th percentile of 0.74 pp.
That any other lot from the same supplier has the same composition. Batch-to-batch variation is larger than within-batch variation for every supplier here.
That the material is suitable for administration to a human or an animal. These are research compounds. No result on this site is a safety assessment and the index takes no position on use.
That the material was manufactured by the supplier that sold it. Contract synthesis is normal in this market and twenty-nine batches in the index fingerprint to a bulk from a different company than the one named on the label.

Section 6

Annotations 4

Signed technical comments from index contributors. Not a discussion forum — annotations question or contextualise the result, and the data team replies where a reply is warranted.

nmr_qnmr06 Dec 2025

Where mass spectrometry is unhelpful, quantitative NMR is orthogonal and does not care about ionisation. It is expensive and it is the correct next step on a record like this.

survivor_lots06 Dec 2025

Even a perfectly blind purchase is a lot somebody chose to test. Provenance fixes one selection problem and leaves the other standing.

buyer_sourced06 Dec 2025

No relationship between submitter and supplier is declared on this record, and the contributor register holds none. That is the default and it is what the provenance class asserts.

valley_drop06 Dec 2025

Valley height relative to the smaller peak is the practical criterion an operator uses, and it is not on the report. Resolution is a proxy for it and an imperfect one on asymmetric pairs.

Section 7

Related records

Same batch — lot GGPE-2509-N9693 n=3

Report	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Flags	Result
AX-2025-020209	GGPE-2509-N9693	Janoshik	2025-Q4	98.76	4.66	95.8	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2025-020210	GGPE-2509-N9693	Janoshik	2025-Q4	98.61	3.86	100.3	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS

Batch rollup and reproducibility assessment →

Cross-sections

Other recent BPC-157 records in the index.
Report	Supplier	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Flags	Result
AX-2026-043319	CPC	CPC-2602-W1610	Medutest	2026-Q3	98.82	2.88	103.5	Buyer-sourced	2	MARGINAL
AX-2026-041766	TFS	TFS-{CAT}-1156	Janoshik	2026-Q3	99.54	6.34	—	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL
AX-2026-043445	BCH	BCH-2603-G4350	Nordanalyt	2026-Q3	98.42	4.87	93.6	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL
AX-2026-043440	BCH	BCH-2603-G4350	VendorInvestigate	2026-Q3	98.61	4.11	—	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL
AX-2026-043442	BCH	BCH-2603-G4350	Janoshik	2026-Q3	98.65	4.78	—	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL
AX-2026-043449	BCH	BCH-2603-G4350	Kestrel	2026-Q3	99.74	4.92	91.3	Supplier-supplied	2	MARGINAL
AX-2026-043448	BCH	BCH-2603-G4350	Janoshik	2026-Q3	98.55	4.69	106.9	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL
AX-2026-043318	CPC	CPC-2602-W1610	VendorInvestigate	2026-Q3	98.47	3.12	104.1	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL

Other recent GGPeps records in the index.
Report	Compound	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Result
AX-2026-042784	CJC-1295 (no DAC)	GGPE-2606-E1234	Medutest	2026-Q3	98.27	4.55	—	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-042786	CJC-1295 (no DAC)	GGPE-2606-E1234	Janoshik	2026-Q3	98.22	3.77	—	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-042858	Selank	GGPE-2603-J2447	VendorInvestigate	2026-Q3	98.87	8.85	99.4	Buyer-sourced	FAIL
AX-2026-042783	CJC-1295 (no DAC)	GGPE-2606-E1234	Janoshik	2026-Q3	98.22	4.45	90.6	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-042757	Melanotan II	GGPE-2603-P1474	Janoshik	2026-Q3	99.54	6.78	92.0	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-042785	CJC-1295 (no DAC)	GGPE-2606-E1234	PeptideMeter	2026-Q3	97.70	4.64	91.4	Buyer-sourced	FAIL
AX-2026-042756	Melanotan II	GGPE-2603-P1474	Nordanalyt	2026-Q3	99.17	7.04	—	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-042755	Melanotan II	GGPE-2603-P1474	Nordanalyt	2026-Q3	99.25	6.58	90.4	Buyer-sourced	PASS